Sherman v. Oswald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sherman v. Oswald

32 A.D.2d 621, 300 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4059

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 621 (Sherman v. Oswald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. Oswald, 32 A.D.2d 621, 300 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment entered January 30, 1969, directing reinstatement of petitioner-respondent in his prior position with respondent-appellant board as of November 17, 1968, unanimously reversed on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and petition dismissed. The order of this court of November 7, 1968, by which petitioner-respondent’s punishment for misconduct was reduced from dismissal to suspension for a total period of two years, the memorandum decision implemented by that order, and the memorandum decision and order of this court of December 4, 1968, denying reargument, all spelled out clearly that it was the court’s intention that the reduced punishment was to amount, in effect, to a deprivation of pay for a period of two years. Respondent-appellant board’s position is in accord with the court’s intention. Concur—Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewich and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered January 30, 1969, directing reinstatement of petitioner-respondent in his prior position with respondent-appellant board as of November 17, 1968, unanimously reversed on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and petition dismissed. The order of this court of November 7, 1968, by which petitioner-respondent’s punishment for misconduct was reduced from dismissal to suspension for a total period of two years, the memorandum decision implemented by that order, and the memorandum decision and order of this court of December 4, 1968, denying reargument, all spelled out clearly that it was the court’s intention that the reduced punishment was to amount, in effect, to a deprivation of pay for a period of two years. Respondent-appellant board’s position is in accord with the court’s intention. Concur—Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewich and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 621, 300 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-oswald-nyappdiv-1969.