Sherman v. Oelsner

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Sherman v. Oelsner

135 N.Y.S. 592

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 135 N.Y.S. 592 (Sherman v. Oelsner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. Oelsner, 135 N.Y.S. 592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The summons in this action was never personally served upon either of these defendants, and they never appeared in the lower court in a manner sufficient to confer jurisdiction over the person. The service of the summons upon one Walter, as the agent of a copartnership, is unauthorized, and the defendants were not bound by such service.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The summons in this action was never personally served upon either of these defendants, and they never appeared in the lower court in a manner sufficient to confer jurisdiction over the person. The service of the summons upon one Walter, as the agent of a copartnership, is unauthorized, and the defendants were not bound by such service.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 N.Y.S. 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-oelsner-nyappterm-1912.