Sherman v. Needham
This text of 21 Mass. 66 (Sherman v. Needham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We incline to the opinion, that the first objection is well taken; and that this is not like the case where the regular evidence has been lost and inferior evidence is admitted. The legislature seem to have prescribed the mode of taking the oath, and the time when it shall be certified, and we think the evidence of the certificate cannot be dispensed with.1 We shall grant a certiorari on this ground, [71]*71leaving the question open however for further argument, upon the return of the writ.
The other objection is not valid. We think the legislature have made a reasonable rule, and that it is not repugnant either to the constitution of the United States or to the act of congress.
Certiorari awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Mass. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-needham-mass-1826.