Sherman v. Merrillville The Town of
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
CHANEL SHERMAN,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 2:23-CV-00429-GSL-APR
MERRILLVILLE THE TOWN OF, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Andrew Rodovich’s report and recommendation entered on April 7, 2025. [DE 28]. For the reasons fully explained in the report, Judge Rodovich recommends that the Court dismiss the case with prejudice. Over fourteen days have passed without any objections being filed, so the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” (citations omitted)). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Rodovich’s report and recommendation in full and orders that the case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
SO ORDERED. ENTERED: April 23, 2025
/s/ GRETCHEN S. LUND Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sherman v. Merrillville The Town of (Sherman v. Merrillville The Town of) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.