Sherman v. Kirshman

261 F. Supp. 858, 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7605
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 28, 1966·No. No. 63 Civ. 461·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COOPER, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 69, F.R.Civ.P., plaintiff moves to satisfy a judgment by executing on defendant’s remainder interest in a trust. Motion granted.

New York Civil Practice Law •and Rules, Sec. 5205(d) precludes a creditor from reaching and disrupting trust assets in order to satisfy a judgment of record. However, this does not prevent a judgment creditor from seizing the beneficiary’s remainder interest under the trust. See Bergmann v. Lord, 194 N.Y. 70, 86 N.E. 828 (1908); Matter of Owen’s Estate, 44 Misc.2d 842, 254 N.Y.S.2d 974 (1964); Carolan v. U. S. Trust Co., June 29, 1966 N.Y.L.J., p. 9 col. 6-7 (Sup.Ct.1966); 2 Scott, Trusts, 1966 Supplement, sec. 155, pp. 40-41.

Respondent trustee is directed to execute and deliver to plaintiff a recordable instrument wherein acknowledgment is made of the seizure and assigning defendant’s remainder interest under the trust to plaintiff.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherman v. Kirshman, 261 F. Supp. 858, 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7605 (S.D.N.Y. 1966).

261 F. Supp. 858 (Sherman v. Kirshman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laborers Union Local 1298 v. Frank L. Lyon & Sons, Inc.
66 Misc. 2d 1042 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)