Sherman v. Kemish

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sherman v. Kemish

287 A.2d 739, 161 Conn. 564

DecidedMay 11, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 287 A.2d 739 (Sherman v. Kemish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. Kemish, 287 A.2d 739, 161 Conn. 564 (Colo. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this matter an intervening defendant has applied for a suspension of the appellate rules and for an expedition -of the appeal. After a full hearing it appears that all of the other parties are in agreement that unless the procedural safeguards on appeal are followed, justice to all of the parties cannot be assured. It further appears that [565]*565due to applicable statutory and charter requirements, a suspension of the normal appellate procedure would not result in accomplishment of the objective sought by the applicant.

The application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this matter an intervening defendant has applied for a suspension of the appellate rules and for an expedition -of the appeal. After a full hearing it appears that all of the other parties are in agreement that unless the procedural safeguards on appeal are followed, justice to all of the parties cannot be assured. It further appears that [565]*565due to applicable statutory and charter requirements, a suspension of the normal appellate procedure would not result in accomplishment of the objective sought by the applicant.

The application is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 A.2d 739, 161 Conn. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-kemish-conn-1971.