Sherman v. Kemish

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Sherman v. Kemish

287 A.2d 739, 161 Conn. 564

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 11, 1971·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this matter an intervening defendant has applied for a suspension of the appellate rules and for an expedition -of the appeal. After a full hearing it appears that all of the other parties are in agreement that unless the procedural safeguards on appeal are followed, justice to all of the parties cannot be assured. It further appears that [565] due to applicable statutory and charter requirements, a suspension of the normal appellate procedure would not result in accomplishment of the objective sought by the applicant.

The application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this matter an intervening defendant has applied for a suspension of the appellate rules and for an expedition -of the appeal. After a full hearing it appears that all of the other parties are in agreement that unless the procedural safeguards on appeal are followed, justice to all of the parties cannot be assured. It further appears that [565] due to applicable statutory and charter requirements, a suspension of the normal appellate procedure would not result in accomplishment of the objective sought by the applicant.

The application is denied.

Sherman v. Kemish, 287 A.2d 739, 161 Conn. 564 (Colo. 1971).

Pincite

287 A.2d 739 (Sherman v. Kemish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.