Sherman v. Higgins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sherman v. Higgins

248 A.D. 678

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order modified so as to make the order one for peremptory mandamus for reinstatement and payment of salary from May 6, 1935, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The delay in bringing this proceeding is satisfactorily explained. Section -445 of the Charter of the City of Buffalo is applicable to these relators. (Matter of Deth v. Castimore, 245 App. Div. 156.) The back salary to be paid is the salary beginning May 6, 1936. (Matter of Mullane v. McKenzie, 269 N. Y. 369.) All concur. (The order directs reinstatement of petitioner in the police department.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified so as to make the order one for peremptory mandamus for reinstatement and payment of salary from May 6, 1935, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The delay in bringing this proceeding is satisfactorily explained. Section -445 of the Charter of the City of Buffalo is applicable to these relators. (Matter of Deth v. Castimore, 245 App. Div. 156.) The back salary to be paid is the salary beginning May 6, 1936. (Matter of Mullane v. McKenzie, 269 N. Y. 369.) All concur. (The order directs reinstatement of petitioner in the police department.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Sherman v. Higgins, 248 A.D. 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 678 (Sherman v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related