Sherman v. Higgins

248 A.D. 678

This text of 248 A.D. 678 (Sherman v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherman v. Higgins, 248 A.D. 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order modified so as to make the order one for peremptory mandamus for reinstatement and payment of salary from May 6, 1935, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The delay in bringing this proceeding is satisfactorily explained. Section -445 of the Charter of the City of Buffalo is applicable to these relators. (Matter of Deth v. Castimore, 245 App. Div. 156.) The back salary to be paid is the salary beginning May 6, 1936. (Matter of Mullane v. McKenzie, 269 N. Y. 369.) All concur. (The order directs reinstatement of petitioner in the police department.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Mullane v. McKenzie
199 N.E. 624 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Deth v. Castimore
245 A.D. 156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-higgins-nyappdiv-1936.