Sherman v. Greenpoint Credit

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 20, 2004
• Docket: 04-1552
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1552

CURLEE SHERMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREENPOINT CREDIT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-04-1036-5)

Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 20, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curlee Sherman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment

adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint

pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman

v. Greenpoint Credit, No. CA-04-1036-5 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 26, 2004,

entered Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -