Sherman v. Greenpoint Credit

Fourth Circuit

Sherman v. Greenpoint Credit

109 F. App'x 567

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 20, 2004·No. No. 04-1552·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman v. Greenpoint Credit, No. CA-04-1036-5 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 26, 2004, entered Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Curlee Sherman appeals the district court’s judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s order that dismissed his complaint pursuant to a previously entered prefiling review order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sherman v. Greenpoint Credit, No. CA-04-1036-5 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 26, 2004, entered Apr. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sherman v. Greenpoint Credit, 109 F. App'x 567 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

109 F. App'x 567 (Sherman v. Greenpoint Credit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.