Sherman v. Garfield
This text of 1 Denio 329 (Sherman v. Garfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the case of Bool v. Mix, cited by the defendant’s counsel, the plaintiff, when in her minority she executed the deed, had a vested interest in remainder, in the land; and having acknowledged the deed as a feme covert, it was held to be voidable only; and nothing having been done to avoid it, it defeated her recovery. Here the land belonged to, the plaintiff’s husband, and she had no estate or interest in it, but only a capacity to be endowed in the event she should survive him. There was nothing upon which - the deed could operate. It was therefore merely void, and required no act on her part to disaffirm it.
New trial denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Denio 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-garfield-nycterr-1845.