Sherman v. Floyd
108 S.E.2d 753, 99 Ga. App. 446, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 876
Opinion
The trial judge property dismissed the motion. It was tantamount to a motion for new trial, filed too late to comply with Code (Ann.) § 70-301; Carolina Tree Service, Inc. v. Cartledge, 96 Ga. App. 240 (99 S. E. 2d 705); Harper v. Mayes, 208 Ga. 766 (69 S. E. 2d 573); James v. Douglasville Banking Co., 26 Ga. App. 509 (106 S. E. 595); Georgia Ry. &c. Co. v. Hamer, 1 Ga. App. 673 (58 S. E. 54); Garfield Oil Mills v. Stephens, 16 Ga. App. 655, 659 (85 S. E. 983).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sherman v. Floyd, 108 S.E.2d 753, 99 Ga. App. 446, 1959 Ga. App. LEXIS 876 (Ga. Ct. App. 1959).
108 S.E.2d 753 (Sherman v. Floyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dudley v. Monsour
270 S.E.2d 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Abe Gellman & Co. v. Jaco Pants, Inc.
129 S.E.2d 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)