Sherman v. . Felt

New York Court of Appeals

Sherman v. . Felt

2 N.Y. 186, 3 How. Pr. 425

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 5, 1849

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 2 N.Y. 186 (Sherman v. . Felt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. . Felt, 2 N.Y. 186, 3 How. Pr. 425 (N.Y. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

were of opinion, 1. That the supreme court as now organized has the same jurisdiction as that court formerly had, with the addition of the equity jurisdiction of the late court of chancery, and consequently that it could entertain a motion to set aside a decree of the last mentioned court. 2., That the motion in this case involved a mere question of practice, or addressed to the favor and discretion of the court. 3. That the provision of the code referred to did not authorize the appeal to this, court.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

were of opinion, 1. That the supreme court as now organized has the same jurisdiction as that court formerly had, with the addition of the equity jurisdiction of the late court of chancery, and consequently that it could entertain a motion to set aside a decree of the last mentioned court. 2., That the motion in this case involved a mere question of practice, or addressed to the favor and discretion of the court. 3. That the provision of the code referred to did not authorize the appeal to this, court.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.Y. 186, 3 How. Pr. 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-felt-ny-1849.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack