Sherman v. . Felt

2 N.Y. 186, 3 How. Pr. 425
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 5, 1849·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The Court

were of opinion, 1. That the supreme court as now organized has the same jurisdiction as that court formerly had, with the addition of the equity jurisdiction of the late court of chancery, and consequently that it could entertain a motion to set aside a decree of the last mentioned court. 2., That the motion in this case involved a mere question of practice, or addressed to the favor and discretion of the court. 3. That the provision of the code referred to did not authorize the appeal to this, court.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherman v. . Felt, 2 N.Y. 186, 3 How. Pr. 425 (N.Y. 1849).

2 N.Y. 186 (Sherman v. . Felt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. Coulston
124 N.W. 689 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1910)
Stark v. . Dinehart
40 N.Y. 342 (New York Court of Appeals, 1869)
Lahens v. Fielden
3 Abb. Ct. App. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1863)
Chouteau v. Rice
1 Minn. 121 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1854)