Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.

679 A.2d 652, 146 N.J. 65, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1220
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 N.J. 35
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 22, 1996·Published

Opinion

ORDER ON REMAND

This Court having issued a judgment reversing the judgment below, 143 N.J. 35, 668 A2d 1036 (1995), and the Supreme Court of the United States having entered an order vacating that judgment and remanding the matter to the Court for further consideration in light of Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., 517 U.S. _, 116 S.Ct. 1730, 135 L.Ed.2d 25 (1996), and good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Appellate Division, reported at 272 N.J.Super. 435, 640 A.2d 325 (1994), is hereby reinstated for the reasons expressed in Smiley, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., 679 A.2d 652, 146 N.J. 65, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1220 (N.J. 1996).

679 A.2d 652 (Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.
517 U.S. 735 (Supreme Court, 1996)
Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
668 A.2d 1036 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995)
Sherman v. Citibank (South Dakota)
640 A.2d 325 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)