Sherman v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sherman v. Alexander

11 A.D.2d 669, 201 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9083

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 669 (Sherman v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sherman v. Alexander, 11 A.D.2d 669, 201 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order dated February 10, 1958, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the defendant-respondent’s fourth counterclaim, modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of .granting the branch of the motion to dismiss the fourth counterclaim, with leave to replead, and as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. The allegations of the fourth counterclaim are barely intelligible and fail to spell out the relationship among the persons charged with conspiracy to harass the so-called cross defendant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dated February 10, 1958, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the defendant-respondent’s fourth counterclaim, modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of .granting the branch of the motion to dismiss the fourth counterclaim, with leave to replead, and as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. The allegations of the fourth counterclaim are barely intelligible and fail to spell out the relationship among the persons charged with conspiracy to harass the so-called cross defendant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 669, 201 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-v-alexander-nyappdiv-1960.