Sherman Meirovitz v. Anthony Haynes

571 F. App'x 502
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 17, 2014
Docket13-3726
StatusUnpublished

This text of 571 F. App'x 502 (Sherman Meirovitz v. Anthony Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sherman Meirovitz v. Anthony Haynes, 571 F. App'x 502 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sherman Meirovitz appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he raised the same claim that was rejected by this court in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See Meirovitz v. United States, 688 F.3d 369, 370-72 (8th Cir.2012). After careful review, we agree with the district court that Meirovitz did not show the section 2255 remedy was inadequate or ineffective. See Lopez-Lopez v. Sanders, 590 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherman Ray Meirovitz v. United States
688 F.3d 369 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Lopez-Lopez v. Sanders
590 F.3d 905 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 F. App'x 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-meirovitz-v-anthony-haynes-ca8-2014.