Sherman & Associates, Inc. v. Oxford Instruments, Plc
This text of Sherman & Associates, Inc. v. Oxford Instruments, Plc (Sherman & Associates, Inc. v. Oxford Instruments, Plc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SHERMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. and ARTHUR SHERMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
OXFORD INSTRUMENTS, PLC and OXFORD INSTRUMENTS AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellees,
and
ASM INTERNATIONAL, N.V. and ASM AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________
2012-1218 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Case No. 11-CV-0827, Judge Charles R. Breyer. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT J. YORIO, Carr & Ferrell LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. HENRY C. BUNSOW, Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendants-appellees, ASM International, N.V., et al. With him on the brief were BRIAN A.E. SMITH and ROBIN K. CURTIS.
JOSEPH J. MUELLER, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, for defendants- appellees Oxford Instruments, PLC, et al. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 20, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sherman & Associates, Inc. v. Oxford Instruments, Plc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sherman-associates-inc-v-oxford-instruments-plc-cafc-2012.