Sheriff v. Scalio

616 P.2d 402, 96 Nev. 776, 1980 Nev. LEXIS 700
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 18, 1980·No. No. 12832·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Indicted for a felony, respondent filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition was considered and granted by the district court, and the state has appealed.

We need not consider the merits, if any, of the appeal. Respondent’s habeas petition was not verified by oath or affirmation as clearly required by NRS 34.370(3). Therefore, the petition was not cognizable in the district court. Sheriff v. Arvey, 93 Nev. 72, 560 P.2d 153 (1977). Accordingly, we sua sponte reverse and instruct the district court to dismiss the habeas petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheriff v. Scalio, 616 P.2d 402, 96 Nev. 776, 1980 Nev. LEXIS 700 (Neb. 1980).

616 P.2d 402 (Sheriff v. Scalio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miles v. State
91 P.3d 588 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2004)
O'SUCH v. State
423 So. 2d 317 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1982)