Sheriff v. Miller

569 P.2d 401, 93 Nev. 509
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 22, 1977
DocketNo. 9773; No. 9775
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 569 P.2d 401 (Sheriff v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheriff v. Miller, 569 P.2d 401, 93 Nev. 509 (Neb. 1977).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In separate cases, which have been consolidated on appeal, [510]*510respondents Miller and Stubbs were charged by criminal complaint with cheating at gambling and possession of a cheating device, felony violations of NRS 465.080.1 Preliminary examinations were waived and informations were filed in the district court.

After their motions to dismiss the charges were denied, respondents petitioned the district court for writs of habeas corpus alleging Chapter 355 of the 57th (1973) Session of the Nevada Legislature, which amended NRS 465.080, embraced more than one subject, failed to state that subject in the title and, thus, violated the mandate of article 4, section 17 of the Nevada Constitution.2 The district judge, without stating any reason therefor, granted respondents’ petition and the state has appealed.

In our view, the provisions of NRS 465.080, which were amended by the 1973 legislation, concern but one general subject, which is indicated by the title. The central content of the title states that the act contains “changes relating to crimes against slot machines and vending machines; increasing the penalty for certain crimes against slot machines; authorizing gaming licensees to detain and question persons suspected of [511]*511swindling; . . Those changes were made and they are logically germane to the subjects expressed in the title; thus, they do not contravene article 4, section 17 of our Constitution. See State ex rel. Brennan v. Bowman, 89 Nev. 330, 512 P.2d 1321 (1973); In Re Calvo, 50 Nev. 125, 253 P. 671 (1927); State v. Com’s Humboldt Co., 21 Nev. 235, 29 P. 974 (1892); Ex-parte Livingston, 20 Nev. 282, 21 P. 322 (1889).

The district court order is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Candelaria v. Roger
245 P.3d 518 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 P.2d 401, 93 Nev. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheriff-v-miller-nev-1977.