Sheriff v. Facio (Mateo)

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMay 13, 2022
Docket84622
StatusPublished

This text of Sheriff v. Facio (Mateo) (Sheriff v. Facio (Mateo)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheriff v. Facio (Mateo), (Neb. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

SHERIFF JOSEPH LOMBARDO, ON No. 84622 BEHALF OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; AND THE STATE OF FILED NEVADA, Appellants, MAY 1 3 2022 vs. ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK9F SUPREME COURT MATEO JESUS FACIO, BY n Res • ondent. DEPUTY CLERK fl

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an order remanding respondent to the custody of the Clark County Detention Center. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction contending that there is no statute or court rule that provides for an appeal from an order remanding a defendant from the custody of the Nevada state Department of Corrections to the county detention center. Appellant Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, on behalf of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department opposes the motion and argues that without this appeal, he will have no remedy to object to the transportation of respondent to his custody. This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No court rule or statute provides for an appeal from the challenged order. This court acknowledges that Sheriff Lombardo recently filed a petition for an extraordinary writ in this court challenging the same order. In that petition Sheriff Lombardo argued that he had no adequate legal remedy thereby warranting an extraordinary remedy. This court exercised

1521to its discretion and declined to entertain the petition for extraordinary writ relief. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't v. Dist. Ct. (State), Docket No. 84459 (Order Denying Petition, April 1, 2022). This does not give the court jurisdiction over this direct appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Silver /4.1Z4,0 1 J.

.

, J. Cadish

, J.

cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. James M. Bixler, Senior Judge Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Marquis Aurbach Coifing Special Public Defender Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(C” 1947A 410. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
678 P.2d 1152 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sheriff v. Facio (Mateo), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheriff-v-facio-mateo-nev-2022.