Sheriff v. Cunha

571 P.2d 112, 93 Nev. 567, 1977 Nev. LEXIS 635
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 17, 1977
DocketNo. 10243
StatusPublished

This text of 571 P.2d 112 (Sheriff v. Cunha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheriff v. Cunha, 571 P.2d 112, 93 Nev. 567, 1977 Nev. LEXIS 635 (Neb. 1977).

Opinion

[568]*568OPINION

Per Curiam:

At the conclusion of a preliminary examination, Arthur Cunha was ordered to stand trial for possession of a forged instrument, a violation of NRS 205.160.1 Cunha then petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus contending: (1) there was insufficient evidence to establish probable cause to believe he committed the charged offense; and, (2) there was no proof of the corporate existence of the victim. The district court granted his petition and the State has appealed.

1. Evidence adduced at the preliminary examination established, inter alia, that blank Bank of America travelers checks had been stolen, Cunha came into possession of some of these checks, and, without authority, he then completed and filled in the checks and attempted to cash them at the MGM Grand Hotel in Las Vegas.

In our view, Nevada’s probable cause requirement was satisfied. The evidence need only support a reasonable inference that Cunha probably committed the charged offense. NRS 171.206; State v. von Brincken, 86 Nev. 769, 476 P.2d 733 (1970). We believe the recited factual circumstances amply support such an inference.

2. Even if we accept Cunha’s conclusion that, for the [569]*569purpose of establishing probable cause, it was mandatory for the prosecuting attorney to prove the corporate existence of the MGM Grand Hotel or the Bank of America, this was sufficiently done by general reputation evidence as permitted by NRS 175.241.2

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Von Brincken
476 P.2d 733 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 P.2d 112, 93 Nev. 567, 1977 Nev. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheriff-v-cunha-nev-1977.