Sheriff v. Chumphol

603 P.2d 690, 95 Nev. 818, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 668
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 11, 1979·No. No. 12302·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

On September 25, 1979, respondent filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition did not contain the consent required by NRS 34.375(l)(b)(3). Such a petition may not be considered. NRS 34.375(1); 34.380(4)(a). In addition, the petition was not verified as required by NRS 34.370(3). An unverified petition for a writ of habeas corpus is not cognizable. Sheriff v. Arvey, 93 Nev. 72, 560 P.2d 153 (1977). Nevertheless, the district court granted the petition, and the state has appealed.

We do not reach the merits of the appeal. The habeas petition was not cognizable in the district court for both of the reasons stated above. Accordingly, we reverse. This proceeding is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition. See Sheriff v. Toston, 93 Nev. 394, 566 P.2d 411 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheriff v. Chumphol, 603 P.2d 690, 95 Nev. 818, 1979 Nev. LEXIS 668 (Neb. 1979).

603 P.2d 690 (Sheriff v. Chumphol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams (Gabrial) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court, 2019
Miles v. State
91 P.3d 588 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2004)
Lewis v. United States
501 F. Supp. 39 (D. Nevada, 1980)
Sheriff v. Marshall
608 P.2d 1101 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)