Sheridan Vs. Goff
This text of 475 P.3d 775 (Sheridan Vs. Goff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RENE SHERIDAN, No. 81963 Appellant, vs. GINA G. GOFF, AN INDIVIDUAL; GOFF PRODUCTIONS, LLC, A FILED CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY NOV 20 2020 COMPANY; SENIOR MOMENT MOVIE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED A. ER '.1.,11•N PREME Ct.7,URT LIABILITY COMPANY; AND RUDOLF BY DEPU ry CLERK SEDLAK, AN INDIVIDUAL, Res ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order awarding attorney fees and costs as a sanction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. It appears that the notice of appeal was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion to reconsider pursuant to NRAP 4(a)(4) and before the tolling motion has been formally resolved by entry of a written order. A timely tolling motion terminates the thirty-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed after such a tolling motion is filed, and before the district court enters a
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
IC” I947A 4404:4 zip Gatti() .454;gattatitgaiti written order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(4). This court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
,Ieg...V.;4....0 1 J. Stiglich 1 ) 1/4 4:64.44 J. Silver
cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Rene Sheridan McDonald Carano LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
01 1947A .41 tyro 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
475 P.3d 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheridan-vs-goff-nev-2020.