Sheridan v. Sheridan
This text of 225 A.D.2d 604 (Sheridan v. Sheridan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Supreme Court correctly found that the former wife failed to make out a prima facie case of entitlement to modifica[605]*605tion of the maintenance provisions of the parties’ separation agreement which was incorporated, but not merged, into their judgment of divorce. The wife failed to establish that the continued enforcement of the maintenance provisions would create an extreme hardship for her (see, Zinkiewicz v Zinkiewicz, 222 AD2d 684; Didley v Didley, 194 AD2d 7, 10). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion in the absence of a hearing. Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D.2d 604, 639 N.Y.2d 732, 639 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheridan-v-sheridan-nyappdiv-1996.