Sheridan v. Presas

25 Misc. 763, 54 N.Y.S. 125
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sheridan v. Presas. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 Misc. 180
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 15, 1898·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question of the identity of the diamonds, received by the plaintiff’s assignor, with those received by Plaza from Presas, was in issue. The trial justice has found against the defendant upon that point. As the evidence was of 'such a character as to admit of this finding, we cannot say that the judgment was against the weight of evidence.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Qtldersleeve and Giegkerich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheridan v. Presas, 25 Misc. 763, 54 N.Y.S. 125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

25 Misc. 763 (Sheridan v. Presas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.