Sheridan v. Major

15 A.D.2d 870, 225 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11309
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1962·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Memorandum:

We cannot decide upon the face of the complaint that no cause of action against Sheriff Major was stated. It would appear that the warrant under color of which the plaintiff was arrested was issued in a civil proceeding. It has been held generally that filiation proceedings conducted outside of New York City are civil in nature (Matter of Clausi, 296 N. Y. 354; Matter of Bancroft, 276 App. Div. 485; Scruton v. Dziewisz, 284 App. Div. 276, 280). That being so, Sheriff Major would be an appropriate party defendant (cf. Isereau v. Stone, 3 A D 2d 243). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term dismissing the complaint as to defendant Sarto D. Major, Sheriff.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ. [28 Misc 2d 822.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheridan v. Major, 15 A.D.2d 870, 225 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

15 A.D.2d 870 (Sheridan v. Major) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glowinski v. Braun
105 A.D.2d 1153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Wilson v. Sponable
81 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Lascaris v. Price
94 Misc. 2d 979 (NYC Family Court, 1978)