Sheridan v. Krupp

21 A. 670, 141 Pa. 564, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1105
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 13, 1891
DocketNo. 181
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 A. 670 (Sheridan v. Krupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheridan v. Krupp, 21 A. 670, 141 Pa. 564, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1105 (Pa. 1891).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff, Catharine Ann Sheridan, slipped and fell on the steps of the house adjoining the one in which she lived, whereby she was injured. This action was brought against her landlord, who was owner also of the adjoining premises, to recover damages for the injuries sustained. Her contention was that he had taken away steps which were safe, and replaced them by other steps which were dangerous. It was no concern of the plaintiff what change the landlord made in the steps of a house which was not in her occupancy. She knew what kind of steps they were. She saw them daily, and if she regarded them as dangerous her obvious course was to avoid them. She entered the house of her own motion, and not at the invitation of her landlord; and as the danger, if any, was patent, she must be assumed to have taken the risk. The court below properly entered the nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Theakston Et Ux. v. Kaszak Et Ux.
33 A.2d 46 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Rehder v. Miller
35 Pa. Super. 344 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A. 670, 141 Pa. 564, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheridan-v-krupp-pa-1891.