Sheridan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sheridan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

238 A.D. 780

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Orders affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Since the plaintiff has recovered in the partial summary judgment granted, the full relief to which he is entitled, we are of opinion that a trial with respect to the severed portion of the action would be futile. (See Devlin v. New York Mutual Casualty Taxicab Insurance Assn., 213 App. Div. 152.) Present-—-Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Since the plaintiff has recovered in the partial summary judgment granted, the full relief to which he is entitled, we are of opinion that a trial with respect to the severed portion of the action would be futile. (See Devlin v. New York Mutual Casualty Taxicab Insurance Assn., 213 App. Div. 152.) Present-—-Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Sheridan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 238 A.D. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

238 A.D. 780 (Sheridan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related