Sheridan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sheridan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

238 A.D. 780

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 238 A.D. 780 (Sheridan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheridan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 238 A.D. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Since the plaintiff has recovered in the partial summary judgment granted, the full relief to which he is entitled, we are of opinion that a trial with respect to the severed portion of the action would be futile. (See Devlin v. New York Mutual Casualty Taxicab Insurance Assn., 213 App. Div. 152.) Present-—-Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Since the plaintiff has recovered in the partial summary judgment granted, the full relief to which he is entitled, we are of opinion that a trial with respect to the severed portion of the action would be futile. (See Devlin v. New York Mutual Casualty Taxicab Insurance Assn., 213 App. Div. 152.) Present-—-Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheridan-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-co-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack