Sheridan Associates, Inc. v. Raffo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sheridan Associates, Inc. v. Raffo

284 A.D. 1043, 137 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4512

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D. 1043 (Sheridan Associates, Inc. v. Raffo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheridan Associates, Inc. v. Raffo, 284 A.D. 1043, 137 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. It may be that upon the trial the circumstances under which the present lease was executed and the terms of the prior leases of which the present lease was a renewal, with respect to buildings, may shed some light on the question of construction involved herein, and for that reason we think a trial is indicated. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Botein, JJ., Cohn, J., concurs in the following memorandum: I concur in the result for the reason stated by the Special Term and for the additional reason that there are other issues of fact and law which cannot be decided upon the pleadings but should await a trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. It may be that upon the trial the circumstances under which the present lease was executed and the terms of the prior leases of which the present lease was a renewal, with respect to buildings, may shed some light on the question of construction involved herein, and for that reason we think a trial is indicated. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Botein, JJ., Cohn, J., concurs in the following memorandum: I concur in the result for the reason stated by the Special Term and for the additional reason that there are other issues of fact and law which cannot be decided upon the pleadings but should await a trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D. 1043, 137 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheridan-associates-inc-v-raffo-nyappdiv-1954.