Sheri Griffith v. the Kroger Co.
Opinion
Opinion issued October 29, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00226-CV ——————————— SHERI GRIFFITH, Appellant V. THE KROGER CO., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1116193
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Sheri Griffith, has neither paid the required filing fees nor
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;
see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order, Fees
Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug.
28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant
did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for nonpayment of required
fees. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Goodman, and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheri Griffith v. the Kroger Co. (Sheri Griffith v. the Kroger Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.