Sherer-Gillett Co. v. Moore-Barnes Co.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The plaintiff had a verdict against the defendant for $443.50, the purchase price of goods sold. The Court set the verdict aside: (1) Because the contract of sale constituted the plaintiff a mortgagee, and that the plaintiff’s consequent remedy was not to keep the property and sue for the price, but to sell the property and sue the defendant for any deficiency; (2) because the circumstances of the taking of the property by the plaintiff constituted the act a conversion, and we add warrants the presumptive inference that the conversion satisfied the debt.
*389
There was no warrant to set aside the verdict, for the reasons assigned by the Court, and the order to that end is-reversed, with leave to the plaintiff to enter judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
103 S.E. 766 (Sherer-Gillett Co. v. Moore-Barnes Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.