Sheree Espinosa v. State
This text of Sheree Espinosa v. State (Sheree Espinosa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered May 24, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00548-CR
SHEREE ESPINOSA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 004-85977-2012
ORDER Court Reporter Tammy K. Landers and the trial court clerk have filed requests for
extensions of time to file the reporter’s and clerk’s records due to non-payment for the records.
Those requests are GRANTED to the extent of the following relief.
Because no reporter’s and clerk’s records have been filed within the time allowed, the
trial court is ORDERED to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived
of the reporter’s and clerk’s records because of ineffective assistance of counsel, indigence, or
for any other reason.
The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If
the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a
finding to that effect. If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next
determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the
reporter’s and clerk’s records. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the
trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which
may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall
determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.
The trial court shall next determine: (1) whether appellant requested preparation of the
reporter’s and clerk’s records; (2) the dates such requests were made; and (3) whether appellant,
if not indigent, paid or made arrangements to pay for preparation of the reporter’s and clerk’s
records. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3, 37.3.
Regarding the reporter’s record, the trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and
address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) whether the notes
from any hearings are available; (3) if available, whether the notes can be transcribed; (4) the
name and address of the court reporter who will transcribe the notes; (5) the court reporter’s
explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (6) the earliest date by which the
reporter’s record can be filed.
Regarding the clerk’s record, the trial court shall next determine: (1) the trial court clerk’s
explanation for the delay in filing the clerk’s record; and (2) the earliest date by which the clerk’s
record can be filed. We ORDER the trial court to transmit to this Court a supplemental clerk’s record,
containing the written findings of fact, any recommendations, any supporting documentation,
and any orders within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal
shall be reinstated thirty (30) days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sheree Espinosa v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheree-espinosa-v-state-texapp-2013.