Sheradsky v. Walsh, Theissen & Boyd, P.A.

530 So. 2d 1087, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4067, 1988 WL 93725
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 14, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1793
StatusPublished

This text of 530 So. 2d 1087 (Sheradsky v. Walsh, Theissen & Boyd, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheradsky v. Walsh, Theissen & Boyd, P.A., 530 So. 2d 1087, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4067, 1988 WL 93725 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record in this case and the facts pertinent thereto.

We conclude that the division of the attorney’s fees in this particular case should have been decided pursuant to Florida Patients Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1986).

Sub judice, the trial court did not comply with the Rowe formula. Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded for a further hearing in accordance herewith.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., JR., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe
472 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 So. 2d 1087, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2147, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4067, 1988 WL 93725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheradsky-v-walsh-theissen-boyd-pa-fladistctapp-1988.