Sher v. Sher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sher v. Sher

53 A.D.2d 606, 385 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13283

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 606 (Sher v. Sher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sher v. Sher, 53 A.D.2d 606, 385 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an [607]*607action for a separation, the plaintiff wife appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 15, 1975, as denied those branches of her motion which sought (a) to direct certain individuals and corporations to submit to an examination before trial and (b) the appointment of an accountant and (2) a further order of the same court, dated December 23, 1975, which denied her motion to strike the action from the calendar. Order dated October 15, 1975 affirmed insofar as appealed from and order dated December 23, 1975 affirmed, all without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances herein, plaintiff’s motions were properly denied. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an [607]*607action for a separation, the plaintiff wife appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 15, 1975, as denied those branches of her motion which sought (a) to direct certain individuals and corporations to submit to an examination before trial and (b) the appointment of an accountant and (2) a further order of the same court, dated December 23, 1975, which denied her motion to strike the action from the calendar. Order dated October 15, 1975 affirmed insofar as appealed from and order dated December 23, 1975 affirmed, all without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances herein, plaintiff’s motions were properly denied. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 606, 385 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sher-v-sher-nyappdiv-1976.