Sher v. Sher

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sher v. Sher

702 So. 2d 256, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13327, 1997 WL 731948

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 26, 1997

DocketNo. 97-735

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 702 So. 2d 256 (Sher v. Sher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sher v. Sher, 702 So. 2d 256, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13327, 1997 WL 731948 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the instant ease, the final judgment, incorporating the parties’ settlement agreement, requires the former husband to pay $101,000.00 per year in non-modifiable rehabilitative alimony. Because the record clearly reflects that in 1996, the former husband paid only $92,583.33, we find that the trial court erred by denying the former wife’s motion to enforce the final judgment. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the instant ease, the final judgment, incorporating the parties’ settlement agreement, requires the former husband to pay $101,000.00 per year in non-modifiable rehabilitative alimony. Because the record clearly reflects that in 1996, the former husband paid only $92,583.33, we find that the trial court erred by denying the former wife’s motion to enforce the final judgment. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 So. 2d 256, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13327, 1997 WL 731948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sher-v-sher-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack