Sheppard v. Washington County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sheppard v. Washington County

159 S.E. 262, 172 Ga. 830, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 219

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 10, 1931

DocketNo. 8337

StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E. 262 (Sheppard v. Washington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheppard v. Washington County, 159 S.E. 262, 172 Ga. 830, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 219 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Sheppard filed a petition against the Board of Commissioners of Washington County and the State Highway Department, seeking cancellation of a contract, and injunction. On presentation of the petition, the presiding judge issued a rule nisi and a temporary restraining order, setting a date prior to the return term for a hearing on the question of the grant of an interlocutory injunction. On the hearing the issue was submitted on the petition and a demurrer. The judge considered the demurrer on the merits of the question, and rendered a judgment denying an interlocutory injunction and dissolving the restraining order previously granted. The plaintiff excepted.

The court did not err in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

Sheppard filed a petition against the Board of Commissioners of Washington County and the State Highway Department, seeking cancellation of a contract, and injunction. On presentation of the petition, the presiding judge issued a rule nisi and a temporary restraining order, setting a date prior to the return term for a hearing on the question of the grant of an interlocutory injunction. On the hearing the issue was submitted on the petition and a demurrer. The judge considered the demurrer on the merits of the question, and rendered a judgment denying an interlocutory injunction and dissolving the restraining order previously granted. The plaintiff excepted.

The court did not err in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 S.E. 262, 172 Ga. 830, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheppard-v-washington-county-ga-1931.