Sheppard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheppard v. State

728 So. 2d 324, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2167, 1999 WL 95392

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sheppard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 753 So. 2d 748 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1999·No. No. 98-00566·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Raymond Sheppard challenges his sentence imposed for carrying a concealed firearm. He correctly contends that it was error for the trial court to assess eighteen additional sentencing points for possessing a firearm where the sole underlying crime was carrying a concealed firearm. See White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998). The State concedes error. We reject the other sentencing issues presented by Sheppard.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Raymond Sheppard challenges his sentence imposed for carrying a concealed firearm. He correctly contends that it was error for the trial court to assess eighteen additional sentencing points for possessing a firearm where the sole underlying crime was carrying a concealed firearm. See White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998). The State concedes error. We reject the other sentencing issues presented by Sheppard.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing with a corrected scoresheet.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.

Sheppard v. State, 728 So. 2d 324, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2167, 1999 WL 95392 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

728 So. 2d 324 (Sheppard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related