Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sheppard v. State

Sheppard v. State

589 So. 2d 1035, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12813, 1991 WL 256205
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 6, 1991
DocketNo. 90-03351
StatusPublished

This text of 589 So. 2d 1035 (Sheppard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheppard v. State, 589 So. 2d 1035, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12813, 1991 WL 256205 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s convictions for possession of methamphetamine and cannabis.

We do not agree with defendant’s contention that reversal is required by reason of a Richardson1 violation which occurred through the failure of the state to produce photographs which might tend to exculpate defendant.

The record does not establish that such photographs were in existence and available to the state. See Demps v. State, 395 So.2d 501 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demps v. State
395 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Richardson v. State
246 So. 2d 771 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
589 So. 2d 1035, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12813, 1991 WL 256205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheppard-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.