Sheppard v. State

554 So. 2d 671, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 65, 1990 WL 787
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1990·No. No. 89-01755·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment and sentence entered on March 16, 1989, after violations of community control. The offense was committed on June 10, 1979, long before the effective date of sentencing guidelines. At the time of sentencing, the defendant did not affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. It is clear that the trial judge intended to, and did, utilize the guidelines in imposing the sentence. Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for resentenc-ing. Wright v. State, 478 So.2d 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). At resentencing, the defendant may exercise his option and affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines, or to be sentenced according to the laws in effect prior to the adoption of the guidelines. We affirm the judgment in all other respects.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheppard v. State, 554 So. 2d 671, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 65, 1990 WL 787 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

554 So. 2d 671 (Sheppard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brammer v. State
554 So. 2d 671 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)