Sheppard v. . Sheppard

3 N.C. 382
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1806·Published

Opinion

The authorities cited are strong to the point for which they were cited, nor do I conceive them unreasonable. Where waste of insignificant value is done scatteredly through a whole tract, the tenant must lost the place wasted; and this is too heavy a penalty where the damage is to the amount only of a small sum. That ought only to be considered waste which is substantially an injury to the inheritance.

Judgment arrested.

Cited: Shine v. Wilcox, 21 N.C. 632; King v. Miller, 99 N.C. 595;Sherrill v. Connor, 107 N.C. 633; Thomas v. Thomas, 166 N.C. 629.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheppard v. . Sheppard, 3 N.C. 382 (N.C. Ct. App. 1806).

3 N.C. 382 (Sheppard v. . Sheppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. . Miller
6 S.E. 660 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1888)
Sherrill v. . Connor
12 S.E. 588 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)