Sheppard v. . Sheppard

4 N.C. 545
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1817
StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.C. 545 (Sheppard v. . Sheppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheppard v. . Sheppard, 4 N.C. 545 (N.C. 1817).

Opinion

The ancestors of the lessors of the plaintiffs did not derive any title from the patentee, or from any person claiming under him. They claim by virtue of a deed made and executed to their ancestor by a certain B. Sheppard, dated in May, 1792. It is admitted by the case that neither their ancestor, in his lifetime, nor themselves since his death, have had a seven years continued possession of the premises in question; and we are therefore of opinion that the deed of 1792, accompanied with a possession short of seven years, did not ripen into such a title as authorizes the present lessors of the plaintiffs to recover in this action.

Judgment for defendant.

NOTE. — See Jones v. Ridley, ante, 280, and the note to Strudwickv. Shaw, 1 N.C. 34, and to the same case in 2 N.C. 5.

Cited: Duncan v. Duncan, 25 N.C. 318; Taylor v. Gooch, 48 N.C. 468;Gudger v. Hensley, 82 N.C. 483. *Page 397

(547)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gudger v. . Hensley
82 N.C. 481 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.C. 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheppard-v-sheppard-nc-1817.