Sheppard v. Sheppard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheppard v. Sheppard

630 So. 2d 1159, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12369, 1993 WL 514046

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 1993·No. No. 92-1503·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant Sheppard’s exceptions to the general master’s report and confirming and approving [1160]*1160the general master’s report. “The findings of fact and recommendations of a master should be approved and adopted by a trial, judge unless clearly erroneous, or it appears that the máster has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence.” Barrow v. Barrow, 563 So.2d 219, 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Bloom v. Bloom, 414 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Landis v. Landis, 486 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The court’s ratification and adoption of the master’s report is proper; the master’s findings are supported by the record. • Thus, the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant Sheppard’s exceptions to the general master’s report and confirming and approving [1160]*1160the general master’s report. “The findings of fact and recommendations of a master should be approved and adopted by a trial, judge unless clearly erroneous, or it appears that the máster has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence.” Barrow v. Barrow, 563 So.2d 219, 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Bloom v. Bloom, 414 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Landis v. Landis, 486 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The court’s ratification and adoption of the master’s report is proper; the master’s findings are supported by the record. • Thus, the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Sheppard v. Sheppard, 630 So. 2d 1159, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12369, 1993 WL 514046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

630 So. 2d 1159 (Sheppard v. Sheppard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related