Sheppard v. Sheppard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheppard v. Sheppard

630 So. 2d 1159, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12369, 1993 WL 514046

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1503

StatusPublished

This text of 630 So. 2d 1159 (Sheppard v. Sheppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheppard v. Sheppard, 630 So. 2d 1159, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12369, 1993 WL 514046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant Sheppard’s exceptions to the general master’s report and confirming and approving [1160]*1160the general master’s report. “The findings of fact and recommendations of a master should be approved and adopted by a trial, judge unless clearly erroneous, or it appears that the máster has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence.” Barrow v. Barrow, 563 So.2d 219, 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Bloom v. Bloom, 414 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Landis v. Landis, 486 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The court’s ratification and adoption of the master’s report is proper; the master’s findings are supported by the record. • Thus, the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant Sheppard’s exceptions to the general master’s report and confirming and approving [1160]*1160the general master’s report. “The findings of fact and recommendations of a master should be approved and adopted by a trial, judge unless clearly erroneous, or it appears that the máster has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence.” Barrow v. Barrow, 563 So.2d 219, 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Bloom v. Bloom, 414 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Landis v. Landis, 486 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). The court’s ratification and adoption of the master’s report is proper; the master’s findings are supported by the record. • Thus, the order under review is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

630 So. 2d 1159, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12369, 1993 WL 514046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheppard-v-sheppard-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack