Sheppard v. Coleman

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION No. 4:19-CV-86-D

MICHAEL RAY SHEPPARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) . ) v. ) ORDER □□ ) . BEAUFORT COUNTY SHERIFF’S _) □□ OFFICE, et al., ) : ) Defendants. ) taeda

On October 7, 2019, the court issued an order granting, inter alia, plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint [D.E. 30]. Plaintiff did not do so. On October 21, 2019, defendants Rose and Cox moved to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint [D.E. 31] and filed amemorandum in support [D.E. 32]. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated in defendants’ memorandum of law, the court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss and DISMISSES defendants Rose and Cox. See, e.g., Parker v, Bladen Cty., 583 F. Supp. 2d 736, 739 (E.D.N.C. 2008). SO ORDERED. This S day ofDecember 2019. «= as C. DEVER I United States District Judge