Shepley v. Story

3 N.H. 63
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided May 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

By the court.

The question lobe decided in this case is, whether the endorser of a writ is discharged from his liability, as sue!!, by a submission of the ac tion to arbitrators ?

It has been decided in Massachusetts, that bail are discharged by a reference of the action and all demands. 17 Mass. Rep. 591.

But, it seems that bail are not discharged, by a reference of tile action only. Tidd's Prac. 993.

[64] There is so close an analogy between the case of bail, and oí an endorser, that these authorities seem to us to bear directly upon the question in this case ; and we are of opinion, that the defendant is liable.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shepley v. Story, 3 N.H. 63 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1824).

3 N.H. 63 (Shepley v. Story) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bean v. Parker
17 Mass. 591 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1822)