Shepherd v. Widincamp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shepherd v. Widincamp

133 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 379, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 368

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 12, 1926

Docket17203

StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 272 (Shepherd v. Widincamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shepherd v. Widincamp, 133 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 379, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 368 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Shepherd instituted a suit on a promissory note. Widincamp filed a plea of non est factum. Upon the issue thus raised the case was tried. The evidence was in conflict, but the-jury had the right to believe Widincamp, whose evidence sustained his plea. The only question raised in the record here is upon the ground that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. The special grounds are but amplification of the general grounds. The trial judge having approved the verdict, and there being evidence to authorize it, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Shepherd instituted a suit on a promissory note. Widincamp filed a plea of non est factum. Upon the issue thus raised the case was tried. The evidence was in conflict, but the-jury had the right to believe Widincamp, whose evidence sustained his plea. The only question raised in the record here is upon the ground that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. The special grounds are but amplification of the general grounds. The trial judge having approved the verdict, and there being evidence to authorize it, the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 379, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shepherd-v-widincamp-gactapp-1926.