Shepherd v. Wallace, Shackleford & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shepherd v. Wallace, Shackleford & Co.

111 S.E. 222, 28 Ga. App. 408, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 552

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 20, 1922·No. 12824·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

The title to a crop which was up and growing was legally conveyed in writing and the writing duly recorded. A -portion of this crop was afterwards gathered and placed in the hands of one who had furnished fertilizer used in making the crop, and the agreed value of it credited on the fertilizer account. The holder of the title brought trover for this portion of the crop against the fertilizer dealer in whose hands it had been-placed. All these transactions occurred in the same county. Held: The judge did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Williams v. Mitchem, 151 Ga. 227 (106 S. E. 284).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

The title to a crop which was up and growing was legally conveyed in writing and the writing duly recorded. A -portion of this crop was afterwards gathered and placed in the hands of one who had furnished fertilizer used in making the crop, and the agreed value of it credited on the fertilizer account. The holder of the title brought trover for this portion of the crop against the fertilizer dealer in whose hands it had been-placed. All these transactions occurred in the same county. Held: The judge did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Williams v. Mitchem, 151 Ga. 227 (106 S. E. 284).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., eoneur.

Shepherd v. Wallace, Shackleford & Co., 111 S.E. 222, 28 Ga. App. 408, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

111 S.E. 222 (Shepherd v. Wallace, Shackleford & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related