Shepherd v. Story

Supreme Court of Alabama

Shepherd v. Story

62 Ala. 336

DecidedDecember 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 62 Ala. 336 (Shepherd v. Story) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shepherd v. Story, 62 Ala. 336 (Ala. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKELL, C. J.

We cannot perceive that the failure of the jury to assess the value of the property and damages for its detention, can work any injury to the appellant. It may be of injury to the appellee, and may embarrass, if it does not bar his right to recover damages for the detention of the property during the time it was in the possession of the appellant, but to the latter it can work no injury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKELL, C. J.

We cannot perceive that the failure of the jury to assess the value of the property and damages for its detention, can work any injury to the appellant. It may be of injury to the appellee, and may embarrass, if it does not bar his right to recover damages for the detention of the property during the time it was in the possession of the appellant, but to the latter it can work no injury.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Ala. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shepherd-v-story-ala-1878.