Shepherd v. Life Casualty Insurance Co.

29 S.E.2d 917, 71 Ga. App. 39, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 265
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1944·No. 30373.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Parker, J.

In an action by a married woman against a life insurance company to recover money paid by lier on a loan alleged to llave been made by tbe company solely to her husband, where it appears that the property conveyed- to secure the loan was owned solely by the husband, that he procured from the lender a life-insurance policy naming the wife as beneficiary, that the wife assigned to the lender her interest in the policy as further security for the debt, and the husband and wife both testified that the loan was made solely to the husband with full knowledge of the lender’s agent, and that the sums sought to be recovered were paid on the debt by the wife from her own funds, and such evidence was in conflict, with the defendant’s evidence, the issue as to the plaintiff’s alleged suretyship should have been submitted to the jury, *40 and. the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.. See Carlton v . Moultrie Banking Co., 170 Ga. 185 (152 S. E. 215); Ross v. Durrence, 173 Ga. 457 (160 S. E. 370); Allmond v. Mount Vernon Bank, 53 Ga. App. 565, 567 (186 S. E. 581); Lovett v. Arnall Merchandise Co., 182 Ga. 356 (185 S. E. 315); Richardson v. C. I. T. Corp., 60 Ga. App. 780, 793 (5 S. E. 2d, 250).

Judgment reversed.

Sutton, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shepherd v. Life Casualty Insurance Co., 29 S.E.2d 917, 71 Ga. App. 39, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 265 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

29 S.E.2d 917 (Shepherd v. Life Casualty Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richards v. Dye
79 S.E.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)