Shepherd v. Life Casualty Insurance Co.
This text of 29 S.E.2d 917 (Shepherd v. Life Casualty Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In an action by a married woman against a life insurance company to recover money paid by lier on a loan alleged to llave been made by tbe company solely to her husband, where it appears that the property conveyed- to secure the loan was owned solely by the husband, that he procured from the lender a life-insurance policy naming the wife as beneficiary, that the wife assigned to the lender her interest in the policy as further security for the debt, and the husband and wife both testified that the loan was made solely to the husband with full knowledge of the lender’s agent, and that the sums sought to be recovered were paid on the debt by the wife from her own funds, and such evidence was in conflict, with the defendant’s evidence, the issue as to the plaintiff’s alleged suretyship should have been submitted to the jury, *40 and. the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.. See Carlton v . Moultrie Banking Co., 170 Ga. 185 (152 S. E. 215); Ross v. Durrence, 173 Ga. 457 (160 S. E. 370); Allmond v. Mount Vernon Bank, 53 Ga. App. 565, 567 (186 S. E. 581); Lovett v. Arnall Merchandise Co., 182 Ga. 356 (185 S. E. 315); Richardson v. C. I. T. Corp., 60 Ga. App. 780, 793 (5 S. E. 2d, 250).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.E.2d 917, 71 Ga. App. 39, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shepherd-v-life-casualty-insurance-co-gactapp-1944.