Shephard v. Merril

3 Johns. Ch. 423, 1818 N.Y. LEXIS 204, 1818 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 16
New York Court of Chancery·Decided August 24, 1818·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The- Chancellor.

It is a settled rule of practice, that a bill ;defective, in its charges cannot'be amended after publication; and cause set down; and especially aftér hearing, by adding- newchárges; Such defects can only be supplied by a supplemental'bill.; (Goodwin v. Goodwin, 3 Atk. 370, Jones v. Jones, 3 Atk. 111. Vide, also, 3 Atk. 133. Cooper's Eq. Pl. 73. 333, 334. Mwland's Pr. 82.) Leave to filea- supplemental .bill in this case’ is granted;-on paying to the defendants their costs -subsequentto the rule for passing publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shephard v. Merril, 3 Johns. Ch. 423, 1818 N.Y. LEXIS 204, 1818 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 16 (N.Y. 1818).

3 Johns. Ch. 423 (Shephard v. Merril) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gillett v. Hall
13 Conn. 426 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1840)
Thorn v. Germand
4 Johns. Ch. 363 (New York Court of Chancery, 1820)