Shepard v. Whitley

829 F.2d 36, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12010, 1987 WL 44794
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 1987
Docket87-7209
StatusUnpublished

This text of 829 F.2d 36 (Shepard v. Whitley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shepard v. Whitley, 829 F.2d 36, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12010, 1987 WL 44794 (2d Cir. 1987).

Opinion

829 F.2d 36
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Tebe Wesley SHEPARD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J. A. WHITLEY, Correctional Officer, Aaron Johnson,
Secretary of North Carolina Dept. of Corrections, Michael E.
Bumgarner, Superintendent of Southern Correctional Center,
T. L. Harvel, Unit Manager, H. L. Yow, Assistant
Superintendent, Lieutenant Galliher, Second Shift
Institutional Superior, Captain Burleson, Second Shift
Institutional Security, John Doe, Officer in charge of
Security Tower #2 on 06-19-86 Second Shift, W. E. McMichael
Assistant Supt., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7209

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 1987.
Decided September 9, 1987.

Tebe Wesley Shepard, Jr., appellant pro se.

Kaye R. Webb, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Tebe W. Shepard, Jr., a North Carolina inmate, seeks to appeal from the magistrate's recommendation that his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action be dismissed. As 'there is no clear and unambiguous statement in the record indicating that the parties consented to the exercise of plenary jurisdiction by the magistrate,' Ambrose v. Welch, 729 F.2d 1084, 1085 (6th Cir. 1984), we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Shepard must obtain review of the magistrate's recommendation in the district court before he can appeal to this Court. Id.

The appeal is dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 F.2d 36, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12010, 1987 WL 44794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shepard-v-whitley-ca2-1987.