Shepard v. Provident Mutual Relief Ass'n

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Shepard v. Provident Mutual Relief Ass'n

44 A. 530, 68 N.H. 611

DecidedDecember 5, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A. 530 (Shepard v. Provident Mutual Relief Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shepard v. Provident Mutual Relief Ass'n, 44 A. 530, 68 N.H. 611 (N.H. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam. *

In the absence of a brief from the defendants, no valid ground of defence is suggested. As the balance of the insurance alter satisfying Minot’s claim was not specifically disposed of in Bradford’s will, it was payable to his estate under the by-laws; and the estate is represented by the executor.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam. *

In the absence of a brief from the defendants, no valid ground of defence is suggested. As the balance of the insurance alter satisfying Minot’s claim was not specifically disposed of in Bradford’s will, it was payable to his estate under the by-laws; and the estate is represented by the executor.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A. 530, 68 N.H. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shepard-v-provident-mutual-relief-assn-nh-1895.