Shepard v. Provident Mutual Relief Ass'n

44 A. 530, 68 N.H. 611
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1895·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam. *

In the absence of a brief from the defendants, no valid ground of defence is suggested. As the balance of the insurance alter satisfying Minot’s claim was not specifically disposed of in Bradford’s will, it was payable to his estate under the by-laws; and the estate is represented by the executor.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shepard v. Provident Mutual Relief Ass'n, 44 A. 530, 68 N.H. 611 (N.H. 1895).

44 A. 530 (Shepard v. Provident Mutual Relief Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.