Shepard v. Orr
This text of 113 S.E. 33 (Shepard v. Orr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action by a widow for the death of her husband, who was a servant of the defendants. The defendants were manufacturers of brick, and the plaintiffs husband worked in the brick-making plant. The brick kiln, used in connection with other portions of the plant in the manufacture of the brick, was a large enclosed permanent structure. On the day of his death the plaintiff’s husband was put to work, with a number of other servants, stacking brick in the kiln. Some of the evidence was to the effect that he was in charge of. the work and supervising it. He had been engaged in this work for some time when one of his fellow servants, a few minutes before the accident, warned him of the danger of the brick falling on account of the manner in which they were stacked. No effort was made to correct the defect in the stacking, to which his attention had been called, and the work had proceeded only a few minutes more when the stack of brick, enclosed in the kiln, fell and caught him underneath them, crushing and injuring him and causing his death.
It is not necessary to add anything further to the headnote.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 S.E. 33, 28 Ga. App. 700, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shepard-v-orr-gactapp-1922.